"merely a disgruntled former worker"

Did the New York Times spike an October story because "it was a game changer" for Obama?

Well, why on earth wouldn't they? The company is a pimp for liberal Democrats.

A lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19 The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.”

All the news which is fit to print, so long as it helps Democrats.

During her testimony, Ms. Heidelbaugh said Ms. Moncrief had told her The New York Times articles stopped when she revealed that the Obama presidential campaign had sent its maxed-out donor list to ACORN’s Washington, D.C. office.

Apparently that is illegal. Allegedly the NYT reaction to that little issue ran something like this:

NOT FIT TO PRINT!! MUST NOT PUBLISH!! AARRGH!

Or something along those lines.

With a little luck, the Times will soon be bankrupt, and with a little more luck, someone who believes newspapers should report the news and let things fall out as they may, will take over.

Otherwise, good riddance to the New York Times. Once great, now a diseased pimp.