Friday, May 27, 2005

Ridley Scott’s Kingdom of Heaven

I thought it was boring, preachy, and more than a bit condescending, but here is a Medievalist's take on it as history. Thomas F. Madden caught it while at the International Congress on Medieval Studies:
Ducking out on what I am sure was a fascinating session called “Focus on Fluids: Analyzing Urine in the Middle Ages,” I...headed to the local cineplex to catch the matinee...

After one hour of ponderous dialogue and assorted arrow wounds I was already checking my watch to see if I might still make that paper on medieval English uroscopy....

When preparing for the defense of Jerusalem, Balian proclaims that it is not the stones that matter, but the people living in the city. In order to save the people’s lives he threatens to destroy all of the Christian and Muslim holy sites, “everything,” he says, “that drives men mad.”...The truth is that Scott’s Balian has it exactly wrong. It is the stones, the buildings, the city that mattered above all else. Medieval Christians saw Jerusalem as a precious relic sanctified by the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. The people were there to glorify God and defend His Holy City. The real Balian, faced with the inevitable conquest of Jerusalem, threatened to destroy the Dome of the Rock if Saladin did not abandon his plan to massacre the Christian inhabitants. That plan is airbrushed out of the movie. Indeed, the good and noble Saladin of this movie lets all of the citizens depart with a hearty, good-natured smile on his face. The real Saladin required them to pay a ransom. Those that could not — and there were thousands — were sold into slavery.

Given events in the modern world it is lamentable that there is so large a gulf between what professional historians know about the Crusades and what the general population believes. This movie only widens that gulf.
It's a shame. I went to see it based in part on Scott's Blade Runner. Perhaps he does better when he isn't propagandizing. That Kingdom fails as history is hardly surprising: Hollywood doesn't do history, they besmirch it, but Kingdom fails even as entertainment. It's gooey PC.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home