Will the the 21st Century See The Dismantling Of Centralized Power?

“The story of the 21st Century will be the dismantling of centralized power.“ : Richard Bledsoe

I can’t think of any evidence for this. Are there any governments on earth which are smaller than they were ten years ago? Is Google’s power shrinking? Amazon’s? Big banks? Has Giant Faceless MegaCorp decided to break itself up into independent twenty employee segments?

We have seen in the last couple decades the creation of a global surveillance state of intertwined governments and private businesses which not even the Stasi could have dreamed of in their wildest drug induced fantasies.

We in the US have evolved from a nation of independent small business owners aka farmers and artisans, into a nation of employees trained to take orders. Our fundamental mindset has changed from that of owners into obedient order takers.

I see no evidence whatsoever that anyone in either major American political party would even consider overturning the foundation of the modern regulatory state -Wickard vs Filburn (look it up)- much less return our government to only those activities authorized by the Constitution.

The UN and leading politicians around the world are working openly to end national sovereignty, criminalize free speech including criticism of Islam and of immigration. Merkel may lose her office, but she has succeeded beyond the dreams of the mullahs in Islamizing Germany, and those people are not going to leave. Nor are those in France, Britain, Holland, Spain, or Italy.

Islam is hardly a force for decentralization, nor is the wave of socialism sweeping Americans who have been taught to despise individualism, capitalism, and the bourgeoisie.

Quite the contrary to decentralization: I think we are far more likely to see the complete politicization of economic activity coupled with a surveillance state like the world has never seen.

Mary Nohl's house in Fox Point

Whitney Gould, the Urban Design columnist for the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, has another piece on the controvery surrounding the former home of artist Mary Nohl.

The traffic Mary's place generated seemed to be an issue for two or three of the immediate neighbors even in the early '70s, but not for anyone past the bend in the road where it turns back south from the westward jog at Mary's. Still, those people were fairly annoyed.

Moving the house off of it's lakefront lot, as some have suggested, would be a shame, but leaving all that outdoor art outdoors is already a major conservation problem- just look at the cracks in the screen of cement faces in one of the accompanying photos. I suspect that whatever Kohler Foundation does to preserve in place, it will be a losing battle with the weather. Putting it inside might allow long term preservation, but would mightily alter the experience.

I doubt that anybody will be happy with whatever resolution is chosen. I grew up down the road, and have the impression that my contemporaries were comfortable with the house, but at least a few parents -Mary's generation- thought it was an eyesore. Still, Americans in those days respected other property owners' right to do with their property as they saw fit. That day is pretty much passed, even where the property doesn't generate externalities like traffic.

Just look at the micromanaging in condo communities: we have changed from a nation of people who respect other people's right to do as they please on their own property to self-righteously denying that right even in minutia. The condo communities dictate the color of your house, the design of your landscaping, what kind of vehicle you can park even temporarily outdoors (NO to motor homes- unlike Mary's neighbors two houses south on Willits Lane who kept one in the yard for years). They prohibit certain species of trees, garage sales, leaving your garage door open even when it doesn't face the street- which is also prohibited. The list is endless.

Whether one likes those rules or not, they are a spreading fact of life as mortgage lenders -and construction lenders- require them. We have already turned into a nation which believes in ordering our neighbors around. It is a very different country from the 1950s and 1960s. I think the difference in attitude toward one's neighbors has been a largely un-remarked revolution. It isn't the widely remarked upon gates on the communities which make the difference: it is the sense of entitlement to control your neighbor, and their right to control you.